Language selector

Social Media Links FR


Facebook CODP Twitter CODP Instagram logo Link to OHRC Instagram page

Rechercher

Résultats de la recherche

  1. 4. Sommaire des grands thèmes et prochaines étapes

    From: Pris à partie : Rapport de recherche et de consultation sur le profilage racial en Ontario

    4.1. Grands thèmes

    • L’étendue des incidents rapportés durant la consultation, jumelée au volume croissant de décisions jurisprudentielles et de recherches des milieux des sciences sociales et du droit, atteste également de l’existence du profilage racial et de la source de préoccupation qu’il représente pour un grand nombre d’Ontariennes et d’Ontariens.
       
  2. 4. Surmonter les obstacles

    From: Comptez - moi! Collecte de données relatives aux droits de la personne

    La décision de récolter des données fondées sur des motifs reconnus par le Code, comme la race, le handicap ou l'orientation sexuelle, se heurte à certains obstacles potentiels. Voici des exemples des questions et préoccupations auxquelles les organisations pourraient être appelées à répondre dans le contexte de l'emploi ou de la prestation des services :

  3. 4. Systemic faithism

    From: Human rights and creed research and consultation report

    Systemic faithism refers to the ways that cultural and societal norms, systems, structures and institutions directly or indirectly, consciously or unwittingly,[128] promote, sustain or entrench differential (dis)advantage for individuals and groups based on their faith (understood broadly to include religious and non-religious belief systems). Systemic faithism can adversely affect both religious and non-religious persons, depending on the context, as discussed in the examples below.

  4. 4. The duty to accommodate

    From: Policy and guidelines on disability and the duty to accommodate

    4.1 General principles

    4.1.1 Respect for dignity

    The duty to accommodate persons with disabilities means accommodation must be provided in a manner that most respects the dignity of the person, if to do so does not create undue hardship.[19] Dignity includes consideration of how accommodation is provided and the individual’s own participation in the process.

  5. 4. The OHRC’s 2008-2012 priorities, initiatives and impacts

    From: Ontario Human Rights Commission Submission regarding Section 57 three-year statutory review of the Ontario Human Rights System

    In November 2008, following public town hall meetings with individuals and groups across the province, the OHRC finalized strategic and business plans to guide its work under its new mandate for the following three years. Our aim is to educate, empower and mobilize partners in communities across the province to raise awareness, help identify concerns and implement solutions.

  6. 4. What are competing rights?

    From: Policy on competing human rights

    In general, competing human rights involve situations where parties to a dispute claim that the enjoyment of an individual or group’s human rights and freedoms, as protected by law, would interfere with another’s rights and freedoms. This complicates the normal approach to resolving a human rights dispute where only one side claims a human rights violation. In some cases, only one party is making a human rights claim, but the claim conflicts with the legal entitlements of another party or parties.

Pages