From: Policy on preventing discrimination because of gender identity and gender expression
Trans people and other gender non-conforming individuals who believe they experienced discrimination or harassment should try to raise the matter or make a complaint with their employer, union or other vocational association, landlord or service provider.
From: Annual report 2003-2004
|
Decisions |
Grounds |
|---|---|
|
St. Hill v. VRM Investments Ltd., et al. |
family status |
From: Policy on ableism and discrimination based on disability
Section 8 of the Code protects people from reprisal or threats of reprisal.[114] A reprisal is an action, or threat, that is intended as retaliation for claiming or enforcing a right under the Code.
People with disabilities may try to enforce their Code rights by objecting to discrimination, filing a grievance against an employer, making an internal discrimination complaint to a service provider, housing provider or to their employer, or making an application at the
From: Policy on preventing discrimination based on mental health disabilities and addictions
Section 8 of the Code protects people from reprisal or threats of reprisal.[146] A reprisal is an action, or threat, that is intended as retaliation for claiming or enforcing a right under the Code.
From: Annual report 2007-2008
|
HRTO FINAL DECISIONS |
GROUNDS |
|
Bekele v. Cierpich |
race, colour, ethnic origin |
From: Policy on preventing sexual and gender-based harassment
Sections 1, 2, 3, 5, 6 and 9 of the Code set out the basic right to equal treatment without discrimination because of sex in services, goods and facilities, housing, contracts, employment and vocational associations.
Sections 7(1) and (2) set out a person's right to be free from harassment based on sex and inappropriate gender-related comment and conduct in housing and employment.
Section 7(1) states:
From: Annual report 2004-2005
|
Final Decisions |
Grounds |
|
Colvin and Jackson v. Hillcrest Variety, Gillies (complaint successful) |
ex, sexual sollicitation, harassement |
|
Henry v. Mrs Beasley’s Bake Shop Inc., Kuntz (complaint dismissed) |
From: Annual report 2006-2007
|
HRTO Final Decisions |
Grounds |
|
Braithwaite, Illingworth v. The Attorney General for Ontario and the Chief Coroner |
association |
From: Annual report 2005-2006
HRTO Final Decisions |
Grounds |
|
August v. Richland Marketing Inc. o/a Richland Technical Services (complaint successful - amended decision) |
sex; sexual harassment
|
|
Boodhram v. 2009158 Ontario Limited o/a A Buck or Two #342 (complaint successful) |
From: Human rights and creed research and consultation report
22. HRTO application review
